For our first guest post, we’ve invited the good people at Grammarlogues,
a software- and Web-based tool “founded on the premise that grammar
matters most when it has meaning beyond a set of memorized rules,” to
write about ways to use The Times to bring grammar lessons to life.
Come tell us how you make grammar come alive
Grammar, Party of One
National Grammar Day. Three words that might elicit an even greater sigh than the term grammar itself.
The holiday conjures up images of celebrants frantically grabbing red
pens and running through towns and cities, adding, crossing out, and
otherwise correcting abuses of syntax and diction. Innocent passersby
and unsuspecting onlookers are interrogated: True or false: You cannot
end a sentence with a preposition. Infinitives should never be split.
Passive voice is always wrong.
Let’s reclaim this national holiday right here and now. Boycott the
red pen that ensnares us in syntactical games of right and wrong, and
pick up a piece of literature, any piece of literature, and explore the
English language with fresh eyes.
Consider the following five
possibilities:
1. Variation Exploration
Reporters and editorial writers have one job in common: holding their
readers’ interest. An essential tool for doing this is sentence
variety, or using different sentence structures to avoid monotony.
The three-sentence paragraph below by Adam Liptak is a good
example—he follows a simple sentence with a complex sentence, which he
extends with two fairly hefty participial phrases, and he concludes the
paragraph with a simple question:
Try this: Find one other example of sentence variety
in a paragraph from an article in The Times that interests you. Analyze
it as we did here to describe why it works. For more on complex
sentences.
2. Punctuation Station
The Times is a one-stop shop for punctuation, with virtually every mark used in every issue.
In the sentence below, for instance, Jonah Lehrer uses a semicolon to
separate two independent clauses. Are alternate punctuation marks
possible? What would happen, for instance, if a comma were used instead?
there is no better model for the punctuation of dialogue than an article containing dialogue. The example below of an interrupted quote is a good demonstration:
Try this: Pick a type of punctuation mark, the
semicolon for example, and scan an article to see where these are placed
and how they are used. Then use one of those sentences as a model to
try your own use of that mark. (And for more on semicolons)
3. Rule Breaker
You must understand the “rules” of grammar before you break them. If
you read The Times regularly, you’ll see instances when writers
intentionally break the “rules” to achieve a purpose. For example:
Is one of the sentences below a fragment? If so, what effect does it have on the article?
Why might a writer use a string of passive verbs in a particular
sentence? In the following sentence, how do these passive constructions
emphasize the topic?
Try this: How many Times sentences can you find that “break the rules”? Which work best? Why?
4. Sherlock Holmes
Incorporating quotations to support a thesis effectively and
correctly is difficult, but journalists deal with this aspect of writing
constantly, whether the text is a factual account or an opinion.
Consider the indirect quote below from an article on the upcoming
election in Iraq. Readers do not know whether these were Suliman’s exact
words; however, the statement must accurately convey his thought:
Try this: You won’t have to read far to find
examples in The Times of both direct and indirect quotations. Try
conversion practice yourself by changing a direct quote into an indirect
quote, following the punctuation approach you see in the Times article.
For more on direct quotes,
5. Confusion Central
The best of us sometimes get tangled up in lengthy sentences,
sidetracked by the ancillary ideas in subordinate clauses or
prepositional phrases.
Take a sticky sentence apart in order to get to its core. For
instance, the fundamental information in the sentence below about the
actor Jeff Bridges is quite brief: Duane is the subject; set is the
verb; the template is the direct object.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar